Photo courtesy of stockfreeimages.com |
Warning: I am not a math nerd. I used Excel to help me calculate the figures below, and I compounded the interest monthly, rather than daily, so the calculations are approximate.
I was recently involved in an internet discussion regarding paying down debt quickly. I talked a little about my experience delivering pizza, and someone interjected with this argument:
Hey, I'm really really not being a
jerk here okay?
But I just want to interject
something. When I was finishing my private school in law (I went to two
schools, the first one I hated, the second was more expensive but it was so
much better), we had a lecture on the "practical side of life." What
came out in this lecture was that since student loans were so low on interest
it was at times better to invest your money than pay down your loans.
Again, not being a jerk just
putting that out there. I attempted to pay off my loans also, but got
sidetracked by the recession. Also I'm really into finance (shouldn't have gone
to law school at all but it's been done) and I actually became a day trader instead.
I wouldn't question your choices,
but definitely wanted to make sure you had considered this. Student loans are
usually government backed loans, so it’s not risk to invest your money at a
better interest rate than your loan--usually. Did you know that under the terms
of President Obama's “Student Loan Forgiveness Act 2012,” that if you pay
consistently never missing a payment for 10 years, that your loan will be
forgiven? Also, under the Act the payment is calculated at a VERY very low
percentage of your income and will always be tied to a percentage of your
income no matter how big or small it is? In factuality, I went from paying
about $300 to $50 a month. But that's not all! The people reorganizing my loan
offered to let me pay at $25/mo.!!!! WTF, right?! This is a totally true
factual story. That law is meant to help you and everyone else get back on
their feet after the recession and out from under these crushing loans.
What you guys are doing is
awesome, but if you've paid down half your debt already, you might want to have
a pow-wow and see if these are still your most desired goals!! Peace.
This got me to thinking about some debt myths,
particularly regarding student loans.
First, let’s clear up some misconceptions that this person has about
student loan forgiveness. As I pointed
out:
There
is no student loan forgiveness law that will just forgive your loans if you
make ten years of payments. There is an act called The College Cost Reduction
and Access Act of 2007 (which of course was enacted before Obama became
President), which will forgive loans after 120 payments to the Direct Loan
program. BUT - this is only for those who work in public service (government
jobs mostly), and you must be employed full-time in public service for those
ten years. Most borrowers will not qualify for this program.
There
is another provision of the same act that will forgive loans after 25 years,
but “[i]ncome-based repayment is only available for federal student loans, such
as the Stafford, Grad PLUS and consolidation loans. It is not available for
Parent PLUS loans or for consolidation loans that include Parent PLUS loans.”
Also,
any portion of the loan that is forgiven after 25 years is treated as taxable
income.
Finally,
please note that these programs are only for certain federal loans. Private
borrowers cannot avail themselves of these laws.
I think the upshot of this discussion is that there
are a couple of ways student debt can be forgiven: if you are lucky enough to
be employed by the government for 10 years straight, and making on-time
payments during that time, or if you are willing to wait around for 25 years,
paying less than the monthly interest, and then paying taxes on the forgiven
balance. Here’s why I’m not doing
that. In this post, I’m only going to
discuss the math. In my next post, I’ll
discuss the psychology.
1.
I have the ability to repay my loans, and I
do not work for the government. Since
I
am
not going to benefit from an income-based repayment plan, or from public
service loan forgiveness, I am not going to have any portion of my balance
forgiven in 25 years or in 10 (unless something catastrophic were to happen).
2.
There is no
substantial mathematical benefit to relying on loan forgiveness in 25
years.
Let’s suppose I wanted to hedge my bets and make the minimum payment in
case something terrible does happen.
Mathematically, I would not substantially benefit. Here’s why:
If
I luck out (like the above-poster thinks he did) and only have to pay $50 per
month for the next 20 years (I’ve already been paying for about 5, so that
would be the remaining term of my federal loans)., that means I’ll be paying
$600 per year, or $12,000 over 20 years. This does not even begin to keep up with the
interest (the average of my subsidized and unsubsidized loans is 3%), which
means when all is said and done, in 20 years, I will still owe
$111,037.75.
That
will count as income at the time it is forgiven. Let’s assume I make no other income that
year, and let’s also assume current tax rates.
That puts us in the 25% federal tax bracket. This means I owe federal income tax of
$27,759.44. I would also owe 9.3% for
state income taxes, which comes to $10,326.51.
In total, I will have spent $50,085.95 (not to mention the 5 years of
payments I’ve already made, but I won’t even count those) in repaying my loans. So, in order to save less than $20,000, I
will have accrued additional interest that inflates my balance well past six
figures. And I now owe $38.085.95 to the
IRS and to the state. I am pretty sure I
am not going to be able to pay this off in a lump sum, since my financial
straits qualified me for such a low payment schedule to begin with.
So, I am still in debt to the federal government,
right? Only this time I owe the IRS,
which has a bit of a reputation for aggressive collection tactics.
And let’s not forget that I am relying heavily on
the assumption that the federal government is going to forgive my debt in 20
years, which might not be true. A lot
can happen between now and 2032.
To me, it doesn’t make mathematical sense to save
less than $20K over a 25 year period, only to end up in debt to the IRS.
But let’s address the other argument, that you can
make a better rate of return by simply investing your extra money, rather than
paying off debt first.
3. It is a myth
that you will make more by paying only the minimums and investing discretionary income elsewhere. Let’s say it takes me 3 years to pay off my
student loans, as well as all my other debt, starting a year and a half ago
(our goal is still to pay it off sooner, but let’s assume the original
goal). Let’s do the math on how much
interest was saved:
Loan Type
|
Balance
|
Interest Under Standard Repayment
|
Interest Under Accelerated Repayment
|
Auto Loan (5.5%)
|
$20,000
|
$ 3,303.22
|
$ 1,414.22
|
Private SL 1 (5%)
|
$ 5,000
|
$
869.75
|
$ 624.77
|
Private SL 2 (7.9%)
|
$10,000
|
$ 4,546.65
|
$ 2,460.67
|
Federal SL 1 (5%)
|
$35,000
|
$17,637.61
|
$ 5,603.20
|
Federal SL 2 (3%)
|
$70,000
|
$25,438.71
|
$15,925.03
|
Total Int. Paid
|
$51,795.94
|
$26,027.89
|
Total
Interest Savings Under Accelerated Payment Plan: $25,768.05
Now, let’s suppose I put all of my extra
money into debt repayment for 3 years, and then
start
investing once I am debt-free. All of
the fixed payments each month total $1,192.02.
So that amount will become discretionary once I am debt-free. On top of that, I have the extra money I was
throwing toward the debt snowball each month, which averaged out to be $3,727
each month. So that means I will have
$4,919 to invest each month once I am no longer paying back debt.
Let’s say I put that amount into an
investment with a 5% annual rate of return.
$59,028 per year for 30 years = $4,176,867.50.
Now let’s say I keep my debt and
put $3,727 into an investment with a 5% annual rate of return for 33 years. $44,724 per year for 33 years = $3,804,534.50.
By
paying off debt early, you’ve made $372,333.
Stay tuned for my thoughts on the psychological
benefits of paying off debt quickly…
No comments:
Post a Comment